DEFIRE
GREEN
defire green
DeFIRE GReeN APPLICATION
DeFIRE GReeN VS. EXISTING FR
scroll view
Test Conducted |
DeFIRE GReeN |
FR Yarn Fabric |
FR Flame Retardant Finish |
---|---|---|---|
Advantages |
Same as general fabric process, saving time and cost- Same texture, use and sewing as general fabric Environmentally friendly |
Maintain permanent flame retardancy even after washing 50 times- No hazard Prefer in developed countries |
Usage Over than 70% due to lower price- Can be used for fabrics which are difficult to implement flame retardant like cotton Mainly used in industrial products or in developing countries |
Manufacturing method |
Easy to work with post-processing |
Use of special FR yarn |
Easy to work with post-processing |
Disadvantages |
It is important to enter the initial market because it is not yet generalized. |
Aramid is very expensive- Phosphorus flame retardant is about 20% expensive Need technical know-how when weaving |
Bromine is prohibited from dioxin problem- It is difficult to maintain flame retardancy during color change or washing. When the sewing is done, the needle breaks. |
lead time |
Shorten the time to general processing |
Need 30 days to weaving FR yarn |
Shortening the period of general yarn |
MOQ |
There is no restriction on MOQ of flame retardant fabric by using general yarn. |
At least 5000 ~ 10,000M due to weaving MOQ of FR yarn |
No restrictions on general yarn or flame retardant fabrics |
Test |
Maintain flame retardancy after washing |
Permanent |
Reduced flammability after washing |
Functional |
Development of hygroscopicity, heat, antimite, antibacteria, deodorant, mosquito repellent |
DeFIRE GReeN APPLICATION
Protective wear
Outdoor
Bedding
Furnishing
Sleepwear
Other industries
(Other automobile seat, etc.)